There is no better investment for any community but putting some milk inside children (Winston Churchill[1] ) (1bis)
The literal meaning of Proletarian is producer of children
If a proletarian is a producer of children, a child, is a product (Child as a product). As a product a child may be produced, sold, bought, let, destroyed and anyway abandoned.
The final phase of the production is entrusted in western countries to specialized firms, public or private and when the product has a fault caused by the firm, the proletarian producer is entitled to an indemnity[2], so much bigger as less the product will be able to be put on the market and on the contrary it will have to be supported at their expense.
When the product is originally faulty or anyhow when one wishes to refuse the property, the proletarian is entitled to leave the product to the firm which is charged with putting it on the market: once transferred to the competent public organs, the product enters the social security” system “. In developing countries putting on the market is simpler and a possible indemnity in case of damage to the product isn’t yet expected.
Always in western countries or anyhow in developed ones, the trade of children concerns only the whole product, while in the countries where law controls aren’t so precise, the product can be sold in pieces.
On demonstrating these theses it isn’t important to establish whether they are moral or not, but whether they correspond to what really happens. For this reason let’s think back over the evolution the word proletarian has had over time.
In the period known as “sixty-eight“[3] the word proletarian was a synonym of all that is good. It opposed the word capitalist which was considered the incarnation of evil.
The word subproletarian was the worst of all,
to point out an indefinite fellow, a sort of”outcast” of the ancient Indian society, all the more that, very often, a subproletarian joined forces with a capitalist against the good proletarian.
During the years capitalists, protagonists of famous soap operas, have become he idols of housewives, proletarians’ wives. To do this they preferred to change their names and now they make themselves be called entrepreneurs; as such some of them aspire to the role of ” maìtre a penser”[4].
The proletarian, apparently disappeared, at least from a cultural and ideological point of view, actually is still existing and does what he has always done and from which its etymon comes[5]: to produce children.
The productive activity of the proletarian isn’t evident in the west where the Church is the only one to exalt the “Christian” values of the producer of children. In the countries of the third world or anyhow emerging the productive function of the proletarian is very active: the more poor and illiterate he is, the more he is lacking in any other means of production, the more the proletarian makes use of the only available means: the ones of the reproductive system.
The production of human beings goes on unceasingly night and day at the rate of 253 a minute, more than four a second despite hunger and hurricanes, drought and war, floods and earthquakes; the product of this industry, besides being the only support of its producers, becomes a very flourishing business a great deal of people make profit on.
The poorer a society is the more children produces. The latter represent the only possibility of survival of that society and by passing from hand to hand the value added increases and they represent a real wealth also for the west.
If we examine the various examples of industries linked to the production of human beings, we can deeply analyse causes and consequences of the phenomenon.
[1] An English statesman and Prime Minister. During the the Second World War he was one of the authors of England’s victory. Famous for a cigar always hanging on his lips and a “V” with the forefinger and the middle one to mean victory.
[1 bis ] The Act (Educational Act 1944) provided free meals and milk – a third of a pint a day – in schools to all children under the age of 18. In 1968 Harold Wilson’s Labour government withdrew free milk from secondary schools. In 1971 Margaret Thatcher (then Secretary of State for Education) withdrew free school milk from children over seven, earning her (among her enemies) the nickname, ‘Thatcher, the Milk Snatcher.
[2] If we read the claim for damages sent by an Italian lawyer to the insurance of one of these firms (a hospital in Rome), the character of the product of the unborn child and the economic aspect of its production are evident. According to the nineteenth century system the items of the claim are listed: for father 250 thousand euros for biological, static and dynamic damages, 130 thousand euros for a reflected biological damage, 130 thousand euros for a moral damage; for mother 250 thousand euros for biological, static and dynamic damages, 130 thousand euros for a reflected biological damage, 130 thousand euros for a moral damage, 60 thousand euros for a damage to health. All this looks a lot like an expense account concerning a faulty product.
[3] An action with revolutionary objectives which,being inspired by the previous American and French student rebellions, lasted ten years in Italy and united hippy, student, trade-union, feminist and autonomous movements under the Marxist ideological hegemony. In those days the reference was proletariate, while the present revolutionary neomarxism tells about multitudes, that is poor people and outcasts from all over the world.(F. Alberoni: Proletariate good bye, now we are involved in ” multitudes “.(Corriere della Sera 13th August 2001).
[4] Master of thought or, with a current greatly abused term, ” opinionista “.
[5] Origin-meaning of a term.
Translated from “Il Virus Intelligente” by Enrica Narducci
Ferdinando Gargiulo offers you a new perspective on why new viral epidemics, assaults, infanticides, suicide epidemics and even environmental catastrophes. Always engaged in his research decides to create a blog to offer his readers content of high value.