Once again the study of what had happened in the past offered me, if not some solutions, at least some work hypotheses. The reference from the Human Papillomavirus to the spirochaeta of framboesia, the skin disease similar to leprosy, was immediate. Then it happened that the skin to skin contact favouring the spreading of framboesia, a cutaneous disease, was interrupted by the change in the habits.
At a certain point also poor peasants could have more wool clothes at their disposal and so they weren’t forced to sleep naked in a close contact to protect themselves from the cold. Spirochaeta didn’t disappear, but just for the principle according to which all living organisms, viruses and bacteria included, are inclined to their own survival, it found a way to survive by attacking man through his genital mucosas.
Sexual promiscuity and the rapid transfer of great multitudes of men engaged in army activities favoured the growth of syphilis. This disease is caused, according to our thesis by the same spirochaeta causing framboesia, but the infection of which occurs through genital mucosas and not through the skin.
Back again to Human Papillomavirus we know that, among more than 90 subtypes, some attack the skin, others mucosas (genital, oral, laringeal), some others both tissues. Each viral type tends to its own survival, but in my opinion there is a strong competition among the various subtypes, that is if some of them are favoured by the circumstances they try to supplant the others. It’s as if even in this case the individual interest of HPV each subtype were subjected to a greater one: the one of HPV survival broadly speaking.
The prevalence of a subtype compared with another one is determined not only by the host susceptibility (we have seen how an individual can be infected contemporarily by cutaneous and genital types), but, instead, life habits are the ones which favour a viral type rather than another one.
In some public places at high population concentration human beings stay nearly undressed (swimming pools, gyms, beaches). Without any other promiscuous contacts the skin, particularly the one of feets and hands, gets in touch with the viruses which are present in the environment and, if it is infected, it’s, in its turn, a source of environmental contamination.
The water of swimming pools and showers, by causing a sort of cutaneous maceration, favours a viral attack; over time many people (not all of them) have understood, in order to prevent an infection, it’s necessary to wear sandals and be very careful with what they touch.
A cutaneous attack from viral types which were selected for this becomes less easy and the environmental contamination from these strains is consequently reduced. When sexual promiscuity increases the possibility, for HPV genital subtypes, of attacking man through his mucosas increases. This mechanism is at the base of the present genital condylomatosis epidemic.
Human Papillomavirus virulence is showed in lesions which can be tolerated also for long time before the individuals who are affected realize an examination and a treatment are necessary.
In this period infected subjects contaminate people like themselves through sexual intercourses or by spreading the virus in the environment.
Environmental contamination occurs mostly in those places where man stays nearly naked and where water or hot-humid sands can easily get in touch with infected mucosas.
We could suppose only women, whose vulvar mucosas can get in touch more directly with sand or water, can contaminate the environment. Actually man can be a source of viruses as well.
We have seen how a lot of the partners of women who are affected by genital condylomatosis are positive to the viral DNA research carried out on urine samples.
In order to understand the polluting capability of a man who is a carrier of the Human Papilloma Virus or some other microorganism it’s sufficient to observe what happens, from a hygienic point of view, on the routes toilets-showers- swimming pools-beach.
Acknowledging how it’s easy for infected men and women to contaminate overcrowded environments, it’s more comprehensible how a virgin woman can be infected by genital condylomatosis.
At this point I’d like to say something I think it’s really very important: even if we admit all that happens in the world of viruses is only the consequence of a case and not of a whole of laws and relations also man is subjected to, the number of possible cases is huge both for the very high change rate of well-known viruses and for the possibility of a trans-species jump of as much great nmber of viruses which are present in the animal reserve.
Man action and habits select, among the innumerable possible viral versions, just the ones correlated to such behaviours according to which every new human viral disease is the result of man behaviours rather than the consequence of a case.
The latter determine the circumstances of time and place which favour the emerging and spreading of the virus.
According to T’ien-T’ai,a Buddhist philosopher the causes of man suffering are due to three poisons: avarice, anger and stupidity (or ignorance). Avarice produces famine and hunger, anger competition and war, stupidity (or ignorance) disease. It’s something stupid or incompetent not to recognize the real causes of an infective disease.
See also:
Ferdinando Gargiulo offers you a new perspective on why new viral epidemics, assaults, infanticides, suicide epidemics and even environmental catastrophes. Always engaged in his research decides to create a blog to offer his readers content of high value.