The first consequence of the application of this theory is that the genes of man aren’t superior to the ones of a plant or a virus more than brain molecules aren’t supeior to bone or muscle ones as to vital importance.If we imagine the whole living Universe like a human body, where brain molecules represent men( who can think) and the molecules of the other organs (skin, bones, muscles, liver) represent the other living creatures (animals, plants, but also viruses), every molecule of the human body is necessary to man life likewise every living creature is necessary to the life of the Universe.
If brain molecules, considering themselves superior to the ones of all the other organs, should decide to multiply endlessly that is to the detriment of all the other molecules of the organism, we’d merely get a brain cancer which would inevitably lead the whole individual to death.
At this point the mechanism at “genetic retroaction”(mechanism at genetic feedback) or negative retroaction which aims to stop a further growth, enters into action also for man or better for human genes[1].
And according to the above mentioned we will try to demonstrate that some phenomena apparently out of animal world and typical of human species, that is suicide and aggressiveness, can take to the classical factors limiting the number of animals.
Before doing so,let’s try to suppose Viruses may be genes that left colonies similar to us: they are made of pure DNA or of a similar molecule,RNA, which autoreproduces surrounding itself with a protein coating. Such molecules might get detached from the genetic heritage of man and, as rebellious angels, have learnt how to live a life of their own.
Their purpose is always their survival but, not taking part in the original project any longer, they tend to stop the uncontrolled growth of the survival machines themselves from which, with a rebellious act, they detached. This theory seems abstruse and yet it was formulated by the official science.
It supposes even which point of the genetic colonies these rebellious molecules would detach from: RNA from the terminal part, DNA from inside the colony itself. A virus at RNA might be generated by RNA, messenger of a molecule of DNA [2],[3].
From our point of view we aren’t interested in proving whether this theory may be true because a great deal of”scientific truths” on which so many practical applications are based, eventually reveal not to be true or partly true, but anyway they are used as working hypothesis.
The idea that Viruses at DNA or RNA can be originated from cells or more complex colonies in order to regulate the number of the original colonies, according to the mechanism at negative retroaction, is true, at least as a metaphor.
In this sense we’ll consider as rebellious angels all those genes assuming an anomalous ( rebellious ) behaviour, intended to stop the wild growth of the survival machines that give them hospitality [4] and so of the colonies of genes they originate from.
Particularly we’ll consider rebellious [5] the genes of intraspecific human aggressiveness and the ones of depression-suicide.
However unusual these theories may appear ( mechanism at genetic feedback or negative retroaction in human population ) this mechanism does nothing but reproduce the same mechanism acting in animal species.
[1] the latter take part, likewise other genes, Viruses for instance, in the intelligence of nature.
[2] Human genes, included in the genetic heritage represented by chromosomes, are made up of molecules of DNA.
[3] As a confirmation of this hypothesis the research of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedcal Research, published on Science, according to which in a world prior to the one we know, any form of life depended on RNA
[4]To the detriment of the survival machines of all other living species.
[5]To the project of an indiscriminate expansion of the human DNA to the detriment of any other living species.
Translated from “Il Virus Intelligente” by Enrica Narducci
Read also:
The genetic feedback mechanism inthe human population . Rebellious Angels 1°
Ferdinando Gargiulo offers you a new perspective on why new viral epidemics, assaults, infanticides, suicide epidemics and even environmental catastrophes. Always engaged in his research decides to create a blog to offer his readers content of high value.