In 2001 NASA researchers discovered an Ozone Hole as large as three Americas over Antarctica. Also North Pole, which had been untouched since that moment, resulted to be without the protection of the Ozone stratus for a large tract. All this doesn’t worry at all scientists who are sure that, sooner or later, maybe in a hundred years, Ozone Hole will be repaired.In front of these events politics, science and economy are making efforts, but their own way.
Let’s reject some proposals so absurd as to make us smile, even if it’s typical for modern science to treat symptoms rather than remove causes: a remedy against greenhouse effect should be the one of shooting, with naval guns of 16 inches, tons of powder into the stratosphere so as to reflect, partially, sun light and cool the planet. Practically it should be a question of imitating a volcanic eruption every second third year.Imagine the fun, we could go on polluting and burning forests, even being left in the dark.
An Ozone stratus, a gas made up of three oxigen molecules, exists in the stratosphere. The Ozone stratus has a very important function since it prevents ultraviolet rays of sun radiations from reaching the earth’s surface directly.
Fluorochlorocarbides, gases which are known with the abbreviation CFC and used in spray bombs and old refrigerators, reach the Ozone stratus and damage it with a chemical reaction.
In 1987 these gases were banned, but their action will persist for fifty years more at least.
” Unfortunately we’ll be very old when the hole can’t be seen any longer” – Paul Neuman of NASA TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectometer ) says joking.
“These processes are very slow” Richard MacPeters, who is a NASA researcher for the same project, says – it will take long time before the CFC can reach the stratosphere and come out of here. It will take a lot of years before seeing substantial CFC drops in the stratosphere.
Also Marco G. Molina, a MIT ( Massachusetts Institute of Technology ) Professor, Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1995 because he discovered the awful effect of fluorochlorocarbides on the Ozone, is neither pessimistic nor worried and on the contrary he defines ” a success story ” the one on the Ozone.But when he is asked what he thinks of the possibility of reducing the greenhouse effect, he says: “Too many industrial profits are involved, mankind is moving too slowly, we are nearly paralysed…. and we must remember the greenhouse effect has a negative consequence also on the Ozone Hole, because, on making stratosphere colder, it slows down the forming of the Ozone.
In the meanwhile even climate has become a sort of business and every third fourth year world conferences are organized.
These events represent, for science-religion, something equivalent to the councils called by Catholic Church in the past. The purpose is to establish dogmas and state correct behaviours to warrant, in those days, the salvation of the soul ( and of course the bodies of those who administered souls ), today, at least verbally, to warrant earth salvation. Like in the councils of the past, there are internal fights, schisms and heresies.
In 1992 in Kyoto and in 1998 in Buenos Aires it is acknowledged that temperature has risen more than half a degree and sea level two centimetres. The forecasts are 2.4 degrees more in 2050 and 12-18 mm in the Mediterranean sea in 2025.
1998 is considered the hottest year of the century, while the latter achieves the record of the hottest century in the last 600 years. As far as solutions are concerned in 1998 people realize that the Agenda 21 and the two treaties on biodiversity and climate changes, issued in Rio De Janeiro in 1992, haven’t been respected at all.
The destruction of animal species has continued at the rate of 100 a day and the emissions of carbon dioxide and gases at greenhouse effect that , in 2000, should have been equal to the values of 1995, have increased 6000 metric tons every year.
Besides it was established, always in 1992, to allocate the 0,7% of the GDP to finance developing countries but in 1995 this financing was only 0,2%.
Indonesia’s slogan ” forests for ever” reported by the New York Times in 1993, turned into the dreadful fire of the forests in Sumatra and Borneo in 1998.
In 1998, in Buenos Aires, it was more difficult to try to come to an arrangement: Arabian countries, first oil producers, reject any agreement, the Americans suggest to defer every reduction of greenhouse effect gases after 2012, emerging countries like India and China say they don’t intend to pay for the pollution caused by the industrialized world in the past.
The poorest countries perceive that their future developing possibilities are in danger. The idea of expanding high tech industries, turning them into industries producing clean energy, is spreading about more and more and it’s supported by the lobbies contrasting the ones of oil and coal producers.
Some people see, in all this, an attempt of a commercial expansion of the richest states, America at the top, on developing countries.
This idea is confirmed by the so called “emission sale”: after fixing a limit for emissions, America would buy” the right of polluting” from the poorest countries which, since they produce less, pollute less, too.
The total amount of emissions should remain the same, but after all America could go on persuing its developing plans, undisturbed.
Supporting, economically, countries like India, a world leader in the production of Aeolian energy, should greatly increase the use of alternative energies like the Aeolian or solar ones, but the Americans and, generally, western countries don’t like the idea.
Western world industrial giants pretend to be the ones who have to exploit this situation and they are already organizing themselves to earn, not only on the exploitation of the so called clean energies, but even on the probable rise in world temperature. Boeing, Toyota, Whirpool formed and financed, with 5 billion dollars, a pool of industries that study climate changes in order to see how it’s possible to get some profits.
Wih regard to this Thomas Gale Moore, an American economist, asserts that only advantages might be obtained from a rise in temperature. In fact the fertility of the soil should increase and agriculture should certainly benefit from it.
In support of his hypothesis Moore reminds that great civilizations, like the Egyptian one, originated between 9000 and 2000 B.C.,just between North Africa and South Asia, between Egypt and Mesopotamia: the hottest areas in the inhabited world.
Also in central Europe, hot periods between 900 and 1300 coincide with positive seasons, while the little glaciation of 600coincided with plague, epidemics, poverty and inquisition.
Moore’s theory might seem absurd compared with what people usually think of the danger of a rise in temperature caused by greenhouse effect.
Translated from “Il Virus Intelligente” by Enrica Narducci
To be continued in:
4) CO 2 and Temperature Increase
5) Prophecies and Forecasts 5: Machiavelli
6) Prophecies and Forecasts 6: Nostradamus
9) Prophecies and Forecasts: Pio XII
See also:
1) Prophecies and Forecasts First Part
Ferdinando Gargiulo offers you a new perspective on why new viral epidemics, assaults, infanticides, suicide epidemics and even environmental catastrophes. Always engaged in his research decides to create a blog to offer his readers content of high value.