Even this theory (CO2 Increase and Rise in Temperature) is debated. Some MIT scientists deny the connection between carbon dioxide increase and rise in temperature. Then they contest glaciers may melt in such a way as to make sea level rise.
According to MIT scholars, because of a further increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, there will be some climate changes but nobody can say which of them. The same thesis is supported by John G. De Ronde, in charge of hydraulic modelling at the Ministry of Transport and Public Works in the Low Countries.
James Hansen, the director of the Nasa Goddard Institute For Space Studies, was the first, more than twenty years ago, to declare the existence of the greenhouse effect at USA Congress; today he says:” no model (climatic) will be able to represent reality perfectly.
Some climatologists even deny the earth is at present hotter than in the past.
Those who are really responsible for greenhouse gas emissions are above all the ones linked to the lobbies of fluid fuels.Fred Palmer of the Western Fuel Association is perentory:” Data coming from satellites don’t show any global heating in the last twenty years, just since when greenhouse gas emissions have increased in a more evident way. The hypothesis of a global heating is entirely based on computer patterns which pretend to represent the multitude of processes in progress on the earth. Rubbish. If we look over the data coming from satellites and elaborated by the NASA, since 1979 no increase has been recorded on the earth’s surface”.
Roy Spencer, a NASA scientist, asserts:” probably global heating theory will never be either confirmed or denied because we can’t put the earth inside a lab and do esperiments with it.
Together with another of his colleagues at Alabama University, Spencer says that, in ten years of surveys, the stratus of atmosphere at three kilometres from the surface even cooled down five tenths of a degree. Roger Pielke at Colorado University draws the same conclusions.
The IPCC (Intergovernamental Panel On Climate Change), 900 scientists gathered by the world metereology Organization and the Agency of Environment Protection of the United Nations, are the main supporters of the greenhouse effect and the rise in temperature on the earth.
On the contrary, according to some people the use of these theories should be a support to entrap developing countries into international conventions, so allowing a policy of industrial colonization from big Western industries that are already ready to export clean tecnologies,” in more than sixty years I’ve seen nothing more autrageous for the scientific method as the way in which the report of IPCC was drawn up, Frederick Seitz, expresident of the American Science Academy, decleared.
Being abandoned by science, because subdued to economy, being abandoned by God, because sacrificed to consumerism, our fellow men find themselves completely alone when nature rebels and attacks them by destroying, in a few minutes, years of their labour and a great deal of their self-confidence. Man has nothing to do but suffer the violence of the elements since he is unable to discover the causes and/or take measures.
In spite of so many contradictions, everybody can realize whether something has changed in the climate. It’s very easy to see how summer so longed, winter not too cold are inverted and the classical seasonal changes, like autumn and spring, don’t exist any longer.
Yet since we are obliged to produce and consume, we have no time to see whether the air, the fields and the sea are changed, whether they are already seriously ill, whether all this means something and what surprises we might expect in the future.
Neither science nor religion can give us an answer and so we have only to ask it ourselves. As we are fascinated by machines, computers, we forget and leave a reat wealth unused: man, ourselves, our mind. Our ability to relate us to a whole Universe as other animals do or with something more than them.
Translated from “Il Virus Intelligente” by Enrica Narducci
To be continued in:
5) Prophecies and Forecasts 5: Machiavelli
6) Prophecies and Forecasts 6: Nostradamus
9) Prophecies and Forecasts: Pio XII
See also:
1) Prophecies and Forecasts First Part
Ferdinando Gargiulo offers you a new perspective on why new viral epidemics, assaults, infanticides, suicide epidemics and even environmental catastrophes. Always engaged in his research decides to create a blog to offer his readers content of high value.